High Resolution Rectal MRI
Role in Rectal Cancer
High-resolution rectal MRI is central to rectal cancer evaluation because of its exquisite depiction of the relationship between the primary tumor and pelvic structures. It enables:
- Accurate T and N staging
- Assessment of MRF involvement (predicting CRM status)
- Identification of EMVI, tumor deposits, and LPLN metastasis
- Surgical planning (TME vs APR, sphincter-saving feasibility)
- Determining need for nCRT or TNT
Key Sequences
- High-resolution T2-weighted images are the backbone of staging
- Multiplanar acquisition (axial oblique perpendicular to tumor, sagittal, coronal)
- Axial oblique images perpendicular to the rectal lumen at the tumor level are essential for MRF assessment
What MRI Must Assess
| Assessment | Key Landmark/Criterion |
|---|---|
| Tumor location | Relationship to APR, anorectal ring, STO |
| T stage | Depth of invasion through muscularis propria |
| MRF involvement | <1 mm from MRF at tumor base |
| Peritoneal involvement | T4a if tumor penetrates peritoneal surface |
| EMVI | Tubular intermediate signal in expanded vessels |
| LPLN | Short-axis size in internal iliac and obturator compartments |
| Sphincter involvement | Relationship to puborectalis, internal/external sphincter |
| Distance from anal verge | Plus landmark-based location |
Impact on Outcomes
- MRI + TME + nCRT → LR rate <5%
- MERCURY study: NPV 94-98.1% for excluding MRF involvement
- PPV 86.5% for MRF involvement
- 1 mm cutoff for MRF: increasing to 5 mm reduced accuracy (more false positives)
Reporting Recommendations
Per SAR/ESGAR, MRI reports should include:
- Distance from anal verge
- Relationship to anorectal ring (puborectalis)
- Relationship to APR
- Relationship to STO
- MRF status at tumor base
- EMVI status
- LPLN assessment (for tumors below APR)
- Sphincter involvement (for low tumors)